USPTO serial 77226147
PROJECT MENTOR COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROJECT MENTOR COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
Columbus, OH
Other trademarks owned by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
Columbus, OH
Other trademarks owned by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
Columbus, OH
Other trademarks owned by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan D. Rector
SUSAN D. RECTOR ICE MILLER LLP250 WEST STREETCOLUMBUS, OH 43215-2538UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ONE-ON-ONE ADULT MENTORING OF YOUTH IN THE FIELDS OF LIFE SKILLS, LIFE ACHIEVEMENT, CAREER COUNSELING AND POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 2007 |
| 045 | YOUTH COUNSELING SERVICES FOCUSED ON ONE-ON-ONE ADULT-CHILD MENTORING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Ohio, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PROJECT MENTOR COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |