USPTO serial 77226253
ACTIVITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gretchen M. Hosty
GRETCHEN M. HOSTY MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP180 N STETSON AVE STE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60601-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Oral hygiene products, namely, dentifrices, non-medicated mouth rinse, non-medicated mouthwash, toothpaste, desensitizing dentifrice gel with fluoride; tooth desensitizing solution | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated mouth rinses; medicated mouthwash, medicated oral rinses; oral rinses to relieve canker and mouth sore pain; dental prophylaxis paste; antibacterial mouth rinses; anticavity mouth rinses; medicated tooth desensitizing liquid solution; orthodontic wax; fluoride gel; fluoride paste denture adhesives; plaque disclosing agents | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Handles for toothbrushes; toothpicks; dental tape; dental floss; non-electric dental flossers; electric dental flossers; manual dental floss threaders; hand held dental floss holders and applicators; handles for dental floss holders and applicators; non-electric interdental brushes; stimulator handles and tips for interdental brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunstar Americas, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunstar Americas, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ACTIVITAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |