USPTO serial 77226437
FINRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FINRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
WASHINGTON, DC
Other trademarks owned by FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
WASHINGTON, DC
Other trademarks owned by FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla B. Oakley
CARLA B. OAKLEY MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1 MARKET SPEAR STREET TOWERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing software development services for databases of information in the field of securities regulation, markets, compliance, financial investments in securities, securities firms, broker/dealers, investment advisors and mortgage industry professionals, and rules to govern securities trading activities; providing advice regarding the use of technology to enforce securities market regulations and rules | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FINRA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |