USPTO serial 77226969
Serial No. 77226969
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77226969?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT (HK) LIMITED
183 Queen's Rd Central, HK
Other trademarks owned by TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT (HK) LIMITED
TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT (HK) LIMITED
183 Queen's Rd Central, HK
Other trademarks owned by TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT (HK) LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)
JAMES M. SLATTERY (REG. NO. 28,380) BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPP.O. BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing; business management; business administration; providing office functions; retail store services featuring cutlery, household or kitchen utensils, household or kitchen articles and glassware, porcelain and earthenware, wine and bar accessories, gift and premium items services; sales promotion for others; provision of business information and provision of business information via the internet; organizing exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes regarding cutlery, household or kitchen utensils, household or kitchen articles and glassware, porcelain and earthenware, wine and bar accessories, gift and premium items; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of the aforesaid goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from a general merchandise catalogue by mall order or by means of telecommunications, from a general merchandise internet web site, or in a department store | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |