USPTO serial 77227654
PRINCE CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRINCE CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rishon LeZion 75658, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Kain, Jr.
ROBERT C. KAIN, JR. KAIN & ASSOCIATES900 SE THIRD AVENUESUITE 205FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33316Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Spectacles, eyeglasses, sunglasses, spectacle lenses, contact lenses, cases for spectacles, excluding protective eyewear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |