Drawing for KEY XP1

USPTO serial 77228009

KEY XP1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEY XP1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence M. Green

Lawrence M. Green Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental surgical and dental implant instruments and apparatus, namely, healing abutments for use with dental implants, ratchets, torque control devices, ratchet sockets, screwdrivers, screwdriver inserts, screws, pins, caps, burs, roundburrs, drills, site preparation instruments, depth gauges, taps, tweezers, cylinders, bone graft systems, ampoules, adapters, insertion instruments, machines for tapping and inserting implants, wrenches, surgical cases and surgical cassettes for use in dental surgery, dental surgical kits consisting primarily of drills, depth gauges, taps, implant adapters, ratchets and screwdrivers for use in dentistry and implantology, dental instrument trays, dental instrument dispensers, dishes for dental instrument trays, dividers for dental instrument trays, dental auxiliary instruments, namely, handpieces and motor units for use in performing dental implant surgery, implant distance indicators and dental surgical planning aids, X-ray templates, milling cylinders, copings of titanium, gold, and plastic; polishing protectors, extension shells, plastic necks, transfer aids, extractors, impression aids, inserting devices, bite registration aids, dental applicators for dentures and implants, denture magnets, bone graft systems, jaw models, instruments for the care and the maintenance of dental implants; dental implants, dental prosthetic components, dental prostheses and parts thereof for dentistryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 17, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 25, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 9, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 9, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance