USPTO serial 77228039
LIVE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2011
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LIVE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. McGinnis
Brian J. McGinnis Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail outlets featuring clothing, gifts, sporting goods and equipment, food, drugs, cosmetics, perfumes, [ furniture, computers, and computer goods, musical recordings, housewares, linens, ] shoes and electronics; business management in the field of shopping centers, retail shopping outlets, marketplaces, residential facilities, hospitality facilities, commercial facilities, office facilities, entertainment facilities, restaurants and bars; art galleries | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
| 036 | Shopping center services, namely, rental of shopping center space; real estate management in the field of shopping centers, shopping outlets, marketplaces, residential facilities, hospitality facilities, commercial facilities, office facilities, entertainment facilities, restaurants and bars; leasing of buildings or portions thereof; residential leasing, namely, rental of apartments and rental of homes; office space leasing; commercial space leasing, condominium brokerage; hospitality space leasing; real estate listing services | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
| 037 | Commercial, office, hospitality and residential development of land and facilities, namely, planning and laying out of residential, office, hospitality and commercial communities, areas and buildings; Construction services, namely, construction of residential, office, hospitality and commercial communities, areas and buildings; Consulting in the area of real estate construction; Real estate development and construction of commercial, residential, hotel, gaming and convention properties | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, night clubs; providing mixed-use entertainment facilities for various functions such as night clubs, [ karaoke clubs, ] comedy clubs, [ puppet or animation, ] operating motion picture theaters, [ dinner theaters, amusement arcades, virtual reality entertainment facilities, ] family recreation facilities, [ museums, ] health club facilities for fitness and exercise or casinos | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
| 043 | Restaurants; cocktail lounges; bar services; sports bars; hotel services, vacation spas, namely, providing temporary accommodations and meals to clients of a health or beauty spa; resort lodging services; providing of food and drink; coffee shops; bistros; catering; provision of meeting or exhibition, conference and convention facilities | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Live! Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Live! Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Live! Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named LIVE!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |