USPTO serial 77228122
WOK2GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WOK2GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
WILLIAM J. SEITER SEITER & CO.220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402-2500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Freshly cooked prepared meals made from meat, fish, poultry, game; prepared meals, frozen foods and snack foods made of meat, fish, poultry or vegetable; meat extracts; fruit, namely fruit chips, fruit compote, fruit concentrates, fruit extracts for cooking, fruit fillings, fruit pastes, fruit peel, fruit pulp, fruit puree, fruit spread, canned fruits, cooked fruits; vegetables, namely vegetable concentrates, vegetable extracts for food, vegetable pastes, vegetable puree, canned vegetables, cooked vegetables; preserved, dried, cooked, frozen fruits and/or vegetables; jellies; marmalade, jam, fruit preserves, vegetable preserves, fruit conserves, meat conserves; compotes, fruit sauces; eggs; milk; cheese; margarine; butter; cocoa butter, peanut butter; yoghurt; edible oils; edible fats; processed peanuts; pickles; fruit puree, vegetable puree; soups; preparations for making soups; pickles; pâté; savory mousses; fruit pie fillings, pie fillings of meat; french fries; potato crisps; potato fries; ice cream; banana fritters as desserts; freshly cooked and prepared sauces for oriental and asian cuisines prepared meals | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, artificial coffee; chicory for use as a coffee substitute; tea, tea for infusions; cocoa; drinking chocolate; rice, rice; tapioca; sago; pasta; flour; bread; pastry; treacle; golden syrup, syrup for food; honey; yeast, baking-powder; salt, pepper, mustard, vinegar; ketchup; sauces, chutneys, relishes, condiments; spices; ice; sugar; chocolate; fondants; candies; non medicated chewing gum; barley; cakes; biscuits; gingerbread; processed popcorn; breakfast cereals; muesli; ice cream; custard; edible ices; frozen yoghurt; mayonnaise; pancakes; pastries; pizzas; puddings; pies; tarts; waffles; prepared meals; prepared meals, frozen foods and snack foods made of rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for the provision of foods and drink, namely, take-away food services, restaurant services, self-service restaurant services, bistro services, catering services, café services, cafeteria services, canteen services, food bar services, snack bar services, preparation of foodstuffs and/or meals for consumption off the premises, coffee shop services, bar services, cocktail lounge services, information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |