USPTO serial 77228216
AQUIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlottetown, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Salai
STEPHEN B. SALAI HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH AND LOMB PLACEROCHESTER, NY 14604-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | liquid food supplements for pets, for companion animals, for livestock and for commercially raised animals; Drug delivery systems for use in veterinary medicine, namely, water based substrates for delivering medicine to animals; veterinary medicine delivery systems based on fluid technology comprising proprietary attractants combined with bioactive compounds, in some cases, but not necessarily combined with specific mechanical devices, or devices themselves, or polymer-based oral tablets to enhance the deliverability and uptake of a wide variety of therapeutic agents; a water-based delivery vector for chemical neutering compounds and/or pesticide-based eradication of unwanted animal infestations | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 031 | Fortified, water based beverages for livestock, large animals, companion animals and pets; bioactive ingredient based beverages for livestock, large animals, companion animals and pets; species specific, water based beverages for livestock, large animals, companion animals and pets. Liquid based, structured food products for pets, companion animals, livestock and other commercially raised animals; bioactive ingredient based, functional foods for pets, companion animals, livestock and other commercially raised animals; liquid foods for pets, for companion animals, for livestock and for other commercially raised animals; liquid based treats for pets, for companion animals and for commercially raised animals; Pet food in the nature of yoghurt for pets and animals, pet food for lizards, reptiles and fish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |