USPTO serial 77228720
ABSOLUTE BEST CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABSOLUTE BEST CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yosef Y. Manela
YOSEF Y. MANELA YOSEF Y. MANELA ESQ. APC5545 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2123LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Apple puree; Applesauce; Artichoke paste; Canned fish; Sardines; Oysters; Palm oil; Baked beans; Banana chips; Blended oil; Blue mussels; Bone oil; Canned fruits; Canned or bottled fruits; Canned or bottled vegetables; Canned processed olives; Canned tomatoes; Canola oil; Clams; Coconut oil and fat; Condiments namely, pepper oil; Corn oil; Crystallized fruit; Cut fruits; Cut vegetables; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dried beans; Dried beef; Dried edible algae; Dried edible seaweed (hoshi-wakame); Dried figs; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruits; Dried soybeans; Dried vegetables; Dry or aromatized fruit; Edible fats; Edible oil; Fish, namely, tuna in brine, mackeral in tinnot live; Condensed milk; Vegetable chips; Vegetable oils; Vegetable paste; Vegetable puree; Vegetables, instant frozen; Whale oil and fat; Tinned olives; Tinned tomatoes; Tomato paste; Tomato puree; Tuna fish; Soybean oil for cooking; Spicy pickles; Sunflower oil; Sliced fruits; Sliced vegetables; Smoked fish; Sesame oil; Refried beans; Rice bran oil; Roasted nuts; Salad oil; Sauerkraut; Processed potatoes; Processed pumpkin seeds; Processed quince; Processed roots; Processed soy beans; Processed sweet potatoes; Processed vegetables; Processed vegetables and fruits; Processed yams; Raisins; Rape oil; Processed lemons; Processed mangos; Processed mushrooms; Processed mustard greens; Processed nuts; Processed oils and fats; Processed olive puree; Processed olives; Processed onions; Processed oranges; Processed papayas; Processed peaches; Processed peels; Processed peppers; Processed pignoli pine nuts; Processed asparagus; Processed avocados; Processed bean sprouts; Processed beans; Processed beets; Processed blueberries; Processed cabbage; Processed cactus for food purposes; Processed cherries; Processed coconut; Processed dates; Processed fruits; Processed garlic; Processed ginseng for use as a vegetable; Processed hearts of palm; Preserved vegetables (in oil); Preserved, dried and cooked olives; Preserved, dried, cooked and grilled vegetables; Processed almonds; Processed anchovies; Processed apples; Processed apricots; Processed artichokes; Pickled fruits; Pickled vegetables; Pickles; Powdered oils and fats; Oils and fats for food; Olive oil; Peanut butter; Jams; Jellies; Fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; Fruits preserved in alcohol; Frozen fruits; Frozen vegetables; Fruit chips; Fruit conserves; Fruit leathers; Fruit preserves; Fermented vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |