USPTO serial 77228975
ECOFRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOFRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
Valorem Building Systems, Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
ECOFRAME BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC.
CONCORD, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin R. Jackson
JUSTIN R. JACKSON PEACOCK MYERS, P.C.PO BOX 26927ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87125-6927UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Building materials of metal for the fabrication of building components, namely, wall studs in the nature of building wall framing, floor joists, roof trusses, windows, window frames, doors and door frames; metal greenhouses; portable structures of metal, namely, storage sheds and bins; metal building components, namely, pre-fabricated wall structures, decks, balconies and verandas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction services, namely, the construction of residential, commercial and industrial buildings; contracting services, namely, general construction contracting services; building engineering services, namely, engineering drawing services and engineering field review services; construction management services, namely, building project management services in the nature of construction supervision | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Building engineering services, namely engineering drawing services; building engineering services, namely engineering analysis services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Valorem Building Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOFRAME BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ECOFRAME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |