Drawing for KOSHER KOLLEGE

USPTO serial 77229316

KOSHER KOLLEGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOSHER KOLLEGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Bikus

Christopher M. Bikus Husch Blackwell Sanders LLPSuite 21001620 Dodge StreetOmaha, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-shirts and capsACTIVE—
029Poultry; frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, poultry or vegetables; soups; packaged meals, namely, refrigerated side dishes consisting primarily of meat, poultry or vegetables; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, poultry or vegetables; milk; cheese; cottage cheese; baked beans; frankfurters; knockwurst; corned beef; salami; bologna; pastrami; picklesACTIVE—
030Franks in a pastry, namely, beef franks-in-a-blanket; mustardACTIVE—
043Delicatessen restaurants and restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 17, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 17, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance