USPTO serial 77229785
INNOVATIVE WEB DESIGNS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNOVATIVE WEB DESIGNS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Creative marketing design services; Design of internet advertising; Marketing services, namely providing informational web pages designed to generate sales traffic via hyperlinks to other web sites; Providing a web site at which users can offer goods for sale and buy goods offered by others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer site design; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consulting services in the field of design of newsletters; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Creating or maintaining web sites for others; Creation and maintenance of web sites for others; Creation and provision of web pages to and for third parties; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and development of information and data bases; Design and development of multimedia products; Design and development of networks; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design and maintenance of computer sites for third parties; Design of home pages; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Design of homepages and web-sites; Design of homepages and websites; Design, creation, hosting and maintenance of internet sites for third parties; Design, creation, hosting, maintenance of websites for others; Design, development and implementation of software; Designing websites for advertising purposes; Development, design and updating of home pages; Displaying the web sites and images of others on a computer server; Providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and on-line web links to other web sites; Web site hosting services(Based on Intent to Use) Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussions; E-mail system design and implementation for others; Graphic art design; Graphic design services; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network | ACTIVE | Apr 24, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |