USPTO serial 77230318
5-FACTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 5-FACTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
TERESA LEE PRYOR CASHMAN LLP7 TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed materials, namely, books, magazines, newspapers, newsletters and publications in the nature of magazines containing information in the field of health, fitness, diet, wellness and lifestyle instruction | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing and apparel, namely, shirts, T-shirts, under shirts, night shirts, rugby shirts, polo shirts, cardigans, jerseys, uniforms, athletic uniforms, pants, trousers, slacks, jeans, denim jeans, culottes, cargo pants, overalls, coveralls, jumpers, jump suits, shorts, boxer shorts, tops, crop tops, tank tops, halter tops, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, sweat pants, wraps, warm-up suits, jogging suits, track suits, blouses, skirts, dresses, gowns, sweaters, vests, fleece vests, pullovers, snow suits, parkas, capes, anoraks, ponchos, jackets, reversible jackets, coats, blazers, suits, turtlenecks, swimwear, beachwear, tennis wear, surf wear, ski wear, infantwear, baby bibs not of paper, cloth diapers, wrist bands, sweat bands, aprons, scarves, bandanas, belts, suspenders, neckwear, neckties, ties, neckerchiefs, ascots, underwear, briefs, swim and bathing trunks, bras, sports bras, brassieres, foundation garments, socks, loungewear, robes, bathrobes, underclothes, pajamas, sleepwear, sarongs, leg warmers, hosiery, pantyhose, body stockings, knee highs, leggings, tights, leotards, body suits, unitards, body shapers, gloves, mittens, footwear, shoes, sneakers, boots, sandals, flip-flops, slippers; headgear, namely, headwear, caps, swim caps, berets, beanies, hats, visors, headbands, ear muffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | sporting equipment, namely, leg guards and weights for athletic use, hand pads for athletic use, knee guards and pads for athletic use, leg guards and weights for athletic use; barbells and dumbbells; games, namely, arcade games | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal based energy bars not for use as a meal replacement; custards, gelato, gelato-based confections, ice milk, ice milk bars, shakes; chocolate powder, hot chocolate, pies, cakes, pancake mixes, pastries, bakery goods and bakery products, puddings, marshmallows, waffles, cookies, crackers, granola, granola-based snack bars, cereal-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, flour-based chips, grain-based chips, wheat-based snack foods, processed cereals and breakfast cereals, oatmeal, grits, popcorn, popped popcorn, unpopped popcorn, processed popcorn, tortilla chips and tortilla shells, taco chips, tortillas, pretzels, corn chips, puffed corn snacks, cheese flavored snacks in the nature of cheese curls and cheese balls, toasted corn kernels, corn flakes, corn meal, flour, processed oats and semolina, rice, bread, bread sticks, bread crumbs, croutons, pasta, seasonings, vegetable concentrates used for seasoning, spices, processed herbs, marinades, sauces, food starch, natural sweetener, extracts used as flavoring, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes and food flavorings; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring; flavored and sweetened gelatins; flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; hamburger sandwiches; hot dog sandwiches; corn, maple, chocolate, pancake, topping, table and flavoring syrups; sugar, salt, pepper, ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise, salad dressings, salsa and vinegar; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; herbal food beverages; grain-based beverages and grain-based food beverages; coffee, coffee beans, coffee substitutes, tea, cocoa and cocoa mixes; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; cracker and cheese combinations; sandwiches, pizza and dough; pasta, macaroni and rice salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, isotonic drinks in the nature of hypetronic and hypotonic drinks for use by athletes and non-alcoholic punch; beverages, namely, fruit-flavored drinks, sports drinks, and isotonic drinks; soft drinks, colas, pop, isotonic drinks, fruit juices and fruit drinks, fruit nectars, fruit juice concentrates, vegetable juice, water beverages, namely, aerated, drinking, flavored, mineral, seltzer, soda, spring and table water; essences for the preparation of mineral waters; preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor, concentrates, namely, fruit juice concentrates; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; smoothies; non-alcoholic, non-carbonated energy and sports drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pasternak, Harley
- Other trademarks owned by Pasternak, Harley
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named 5-FACTOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2010 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 14, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |