USPTO serial 77230795
DIDDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIDDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hoang-chi Truong, Esq.
HOANG-CHI TRUONG, ESQ. FENWICK & WEST801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online computer databases and online searchable computer databases featuring business information; providing a website featuring information, ratings, and opinions about consumer products and services, none of the aforementioned relating to the production of short films or videos depicting interesting persons of accomplishment in the creative, cultural, arts, letters, and science communities for presentation through cable media and the web sites of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple user access to global computer networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; providing online forums and electronic bulletin boards for the transmission of messages among computer users featuring information of general interest; electronic transmission of data and information via global computer networks, mobile telephones, and other digital communication networks and devices; transmission of text, graphics, images, photos, audio, video, and games via global computer networks, mobile telephones, and other digital communication networks and devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online computer databases and online searchable computer databases featuring sports information; providing a website featuring information about sporting events, entertainment events, leisure activities and recreation, and attractions and places of interest in particular geographic locations; online journals and diaries featuring information of general interest; online journals, namely, blogs featuring information of general interest; electronic publishing services, namely, publishing text, ratings, opinions, graphics, images, photos, audio, video, and game materials of others online featuring information of general interest; providing entertainment content for others, namely, text, ratings, opinions, graphics, images, photos, audio, video, and game materials; conducting contests, none of the aforementioned relating to the production of short films or videos depicting interesting persons of accomplishment in the creative, cultural, arts, letters, and science communities for presentation through cable media and the web sites of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a search engine for generating customized information and web pages in response to user defined inquiries regarding consumer products, services, businesses, events, entertainment, activities, recreation, attractions, lifestyles, and other resources; providing temporary use of nondownloadable software for use in creating, uploading, downloading, publishing, manipulating, managing, distributing, sharing, and viewing of photos, files, documents, text, graphics, images, audio, video, games, and online journals, diaries and blogs over a global computer network, mobile telephones, and other digital communication networks and devices; providing temporary use of nondownloadable computer software development tools for social networking and building social networking applications; providing temporary use of online nondownloadable computer software for creating customized web sites; providing temporary use of nondownloadable computer software for creating searchable databases; computer software consultation and design; computer software design for others; technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems, none of the aforementioned relating to the production of short films or videos depicting interesting persons of accomplishment in the creative, cultural, arts, letters, and science communities for presentation through cable media and the web sites of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |