USPTO serial 77231365
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Missisauga, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Braverman
TODD BRAVERMAN BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Point of sale terminal transaction systems comprising one or more of the following components: hardware, operating software, operating firmware, touch screens, keyboards, monitors, video displays, processors, memory, user input devices namely RFID and biometrics input devices, magnetic swipe card and bar code readers sold as a unit; video display units featuring product information and third party advertising, comprising one or more of the following components: hardware, operating software, operating firmware, touch sceens, keyboards, monitors, video displays, processors, memory, user input devices namely RFID and biometrics input devices, magnetic swipe card and bar code readers sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |