USPTO serial 77232234
HAVERFORD QUALITY 250
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3433523Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2008
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HAVERFORD QUALITY 250?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Radnor, PA
RADNOR, PA
RADNOR, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Doctrow
MarieElena V. Ness Haverford Trust CompanyThree Radnor Corporate CenterSuite 450Radnor, PA 19087Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing financial, investment, and securities information; providing information on a selected group of stocks forming a stock index; providing investment fund services, namely, offering exchange traded funds and index funds based on a stock index | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HTC-IP Holding Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by HTC-IP Holding Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by THE HAVERFORD TRUST COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by THE HARVERFORD TRUST COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named HAVERFORD QUALITY 250
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 20, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |