USPTO serial 77232364
LAMBTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAMBTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eastbourne East Sussex, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly, Esq.
DAVID M. KELLY, ESQ. FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software used to track the location of laboratory samples and instruction manuals sold as a unit with the aforementioned computer software; apparatus for recording sound and images | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Database administration, namely, database management; compilation of information into computer databases; professional business consultancy; systemization of information into computer databases; data search in computer files, namely, searching computer files for others; computerized file management; database management services for others featuring online databases used to track laboratory samples | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Advisory services in the field of product development and quality improvement of computer software; computer software consultancy; computer software design; computer software development; computer software engineering; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; development of computer software application solutions; development of software; installation and maintenance of computer software; diagnosis of faults in computer software, namely, troubleshooting computer software problems; professional consultancy relating to computer software; updating of computer software for others; upgrading of computer software for others; writing of computer software, namely, computer programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |