USPTO serial 77232510
COPPEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3963952Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2011
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COPPEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CULIACAN, SINALOA, MX
CULIACAN, SINALOA, MX
Culiacan, Sinaloa, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Casimir W. Cook II
Casimir W. Cook II Anvil Law PLC1875 I Street, NW, 5th FloorInternational SquareWashington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail department stores, on-line retail department store services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Insurance underwriting in the fields of family security protection, life and vehicles; financial services, namely, mutual fund investment and saving accounts for retirement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COPPEL, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by COPPEL, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by COPPEL, S.A.B. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named COPPEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |