USPTO serial 77232680
CARIBBEAN QUEEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETU, JENNIFER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARIBBEAN QUEEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beate Boudro, Esq.
BEATE BOUDRO BEATE BOUDRO, ATTORNEY AT LAWPO BOX 16560LAS CRUCES, NM 88004-6560UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic, coin and token-operated gaming machines, namely, slot machines with or without video output and video lottery terminals; multi-user and networked gaming machines with or without video output or video lottery terminals; computer programs for operating electric and electronic machines for gaming or amusement purposes; accounting apparatus for coin and token operated machines for gaming and amusement purposes, and parts for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of casino services featuring a progressive gaming machine jackpot involving one or more gaming machines, namely, a jackpot or prize with a fixed minimum value which increases until the jackpot is won | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |