USPTO serial 77233080
HELIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HELIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clarence F. West
CLARENCE F. WEST SPACELABS HEALTHCARE, LLC5150 220TH AVE SEISSAQUAH, WA 98029-6834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Patient monitoring systems comprising patient monitors, for use in monitoring patients physiological parameters; computer hardware; computer software for storing, reviewing and reporting patient information for use in the medical field, namely, emergency care and treatment, adult/pediatric critical care, perioperative care, ECG management, resource scheduling, obstetrics, neonatal care, and point-of-care records | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Patient monitoring systems comprising patient monitors, for use in monitoring patients physiological parameters; computer hardware; computer software for storing, reviewing and reporting patient information for use in the medical field, namely, emergency care and treatment, adult/pediatric critical care, perioperative care, ECG management, resource scheduling, obstetrics, neonatal care, and point-of-care records | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |