USPTO serial 77233083
SILVA PANEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILVA PANEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maple Ridge, B.C., CA
Maple Ridge, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Eckels
JANE ECKELS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP701 W. Eighth Avenue, Suite 800Anchorage, AK 99501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Engineered lumber products, namely, wood panels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |