CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RIDGELOGIC DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 77233837

RIDGELOGIC DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIDGELOGIC DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tara Hart-Nova

TARA HART-NOVA PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP3400 HSBC CENTERINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUPBUFFALO, NY 14203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital signage; computer software for the operation of digital signage; computer software for the creation, control and management of digital signage contentACTIVE—
035Advertising and multimedia services for others, namely, preparation of customized digital signage content and multimedia presentations, all for use in advertising; business consulting services in the area of digital signageACTIVE—
042Design and development of multimedia productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 6, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance