USPTO serial 77234354
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwenn Roos
GWENN ROOS LAW OFFICE OF GWENN ROOS26 BROOKDALE AVEWELLESLEY, MA 02482-1021UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automotive, Aerospace and marine components, namely, ignition coils, ignition cables and leads, ignition contact breakers, ignition coil rails, electrodes, protective caps, ignition connectors, interface suppressors for managing the electromagnetic system in engines, temperature sensors, inductive sensors, oxygen sensors, radiator sensors, vehicle sensors, pressure sensors, speed sensors, distance sensors, water sensors, fuel sensors, transformers, distributor connector, distributor cap, distributor rotors, glow plugs, spark plug connectors, spark plugs, ignition condensers, ignition switching unit (to regulate transistor ignition systems), fuel injectors, valves, indicators, heating flanges, heaters, tire pressure monitor, light bulbs, aerials, wiper blades; Motor vehicle components, namely, ignition coils, ignition cables and leads, ignition contact breakers, ignition coil rails, electrodes, protective caps, ignition connectors, interface suppressors for managing the electromagnetic system in engines, temperature sensors, inductive sensors, oxygen sensors, radiator sensors, vehicle sensors, pressure sensors, speed sensors, distance sensors, water sensors, fuel sensors, transformers, distributor connector, distributor cap, distributor rotors, glow plugs, spark plug connectors, spark plugs, ignition condensers, ignition switching unit (to regulate transistor ignition systems), fuel injectors, valves, indicators, heating flanges, heaters, tire pressure monitor, light bulbs, aerials, wiper blades; Automotive, aerospace and marine electric components; Motors and engines for land vehicles and components thereof; Components for the outer bodies of vehicles, namely, structural panels, doors, windows, exhausts, and wheels; Vehicle seats and seat belts; Components for vehicle instrument panels, namely, steering wheels, speedometers, tachometers, odometers, fuel gauges, warning lights; Components for vehicle transmission tunnels, namely, gear boxes, clutches and torque converters; Parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |