CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LOUVRETEC

USPTO serial 77234515

LOUVRETEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3678256Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2009
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with LOUVRETEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. McIlvaine, Registration No. 34,219

John W. McIlvaine, Registration No. 34,219 The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Exterior metal building materials, namely, roofs, louvers, namely, bladed shutters or panels for controlling exposure to sun, wind or weather or for privacy purposes, roofing blades, shutters, doors, gates, fences, screens and panels; building systems, namely, component panels comprised primarily of [ metal roofs, ] louvers, roofing blades, shutters, doors, gates, fences, screens and panelsACTIVEJun 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2020RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 8, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 25, 2020EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 12, 2020PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
May 12, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 5, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 26, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 25, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 25, 2016PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Mar 25, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 25, 2016E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 8, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 7, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 14, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 3, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 25, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 2, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 27, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 4, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2008IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 1, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 31, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance