USPTO serial 77234531
TOWELTRACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOWELTRACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
MITCHELL E. RADIN COWAN, DEBAETS, ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE FL 34NEW YORK, NY 10010-2209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic device which sets off an alarm when moved through protected areas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |