CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GEM GENDER AND ETHNIC MEDICINE PROJECT

USPTO serial 77234920

GEM GENDER AND ETHNIC MEDICINE PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GEM GENDER AND ETHNIC MEDICINE PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT L.L.C.2 LIBERTY PLACE 50 SOUTH 16TH ST FL 22PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041(Based on Intent to Use) education program in medicine and healthcare related to gender and ethnicityACTIVE—
042(Based on Intent to Use) medical researchACTIVE—
044(Based on Use in Commerce) medical servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 24, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 24, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 21, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance