USPTO serial 77235461
SILQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ALISO VIEJO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Byeong Yong Cho
400 S HARVARD BLVD APT 112LOS ANGELES, CA 90020-6805UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair gel; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair styling gel(Based on Intent to Use) Hair mascara; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair piece bonding glue; Hair pomades; Hair relaxers; Hair relaxing preparations; Hair removing cream; Hair rinses; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair tonic; 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Adhesives for affixing false hair; Adhesives for false eyelashes, hair and nails; Baby hair conditioner; Conditioners; Gel for hair; Hair balsam; Hair bleach; Hair bleaches; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair colorants; Hair coloring preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair conditioners for babies; Hair creams; Hair decolorants; Hair dressings for men; Hair dressings for women; Hair dye; Hair dyes; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair frosts; Hair gels; Hair lacquers; Hair lighteners; Hair lotions; Hair tonics; Hair waving lotion; Hair-washing powder; Hydrogen peroxide for use on the hair; Japanese hair fixing oil (bintsuke-abura); Lotions for hair; Mousse for hair; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Pomades for hair; Wax for removing body hair; Wax strips for removing body hair | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |