CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PERFEX

USPTO serial 77235727

PERFEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Faber

Robert C. Faber OSTROLENK FABER LLP7TH FLOOR1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care preparations, namely, products for conditioning, re-texturizing, curling, straightening, protecting and volumizing; hair care preparations, namely, shampoos, conditioners, lotions, creams, tonics and sprays; hair grooming products and hair styling products, namely, gels, sprays, lotions, creams and pomadesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 5, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 6, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 29, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance