Drawing for CODEVINDIA

USPTO serial 77236021

CODEVINDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CODEVINDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent D Stuckey

7720 RIVERS EDGE DR STE 200COLUMBUS, OH 43235-1361UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; Computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; Computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance