Drawing for MEDWEB

USPTO serial 77236024

MEDWEB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MEDWEB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Martin

NEIL F. MARTIN GORDON & REES, LLP101 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 1600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-8217UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Pharmacy online benefit services, namely, online communication through internet website, website portal links, e-mail and web-based database access for clients and pharmacies, and administration of pharmacy benefit plans, not including diagnostic medical imaging and physician practice managementABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 6, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 6, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 6, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Nov 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 10, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 5, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2008GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Apr 8, 2008GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Apr 8, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 6, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 27, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jul 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance