Drawing for COBRA

USPTO serial 77236201

COBRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COBRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Kelly

DAVID M. KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Machines, apparatus and appliances for cooking, heating and chilling food, namely, refrigerators and freezers, electric cooking stoves, baking ovens, cooking ranges, cook-tops, deep fat fryers and electric deep fryers, electric griddles, electric food warmers, electric sandwich makers, electric automatic bread makers, and electric waffle bakers; commercial ovens for baking food; food display and servery units, namely, heated merchandise display cases, refrigerated merchandise display cases, storing apparatus using heat, namely, warming trays; electric food warmers; electric food warming plates; grill accessories, namely, trays; heated cabinets for food; electric heated trolleys for keeping food warm; refrigerated cabinets for storage and display of foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2008ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2008ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance