USPTO serial 77236459
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Suite #1100Washington, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | (Based on Intent to Use)(Based on 44(e)) CERAMIC CROCKERY, NAMELY, CERAMIC VESSELS, BOWLS, PLATES AND POTS; DOMESTIC UTENSILS, namely, GRATERS, SPATULAS, SERVING SPOONS, SERVING FORKS; CERAMIC VESSELS, BOWLS, PLATES AND POTS; DOMESTIC UTENSILS, NAMELY, GRATERS, SPATULAS, SERVING SPOONS, SERVING FORKS, TURNERS AND DOMESTIC CONTAINERS, NAMELY, CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; TABLEWARE, NAMELY, TABLE PLACE CARD HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; NAPKIN RINGS; OVENWARE; CUPS; TEAPOTS; NAPKIN HOLDERS; DRINKING VESSELS; JUGS; SALAD BOWLS; FIGURINES OF CHINA AND GLASS; PLANT CONTAINERS, NAMELY, PLANT POTS, PLANT BASKETS, PLANTERS FOR PLANTS; VASES; CHINAWARE, NAMELY, SERVING PLATTERS; CHINA PLATES, BOWLS, TEACUPS, SAUCERS, CUPS, MUGS, TRAYS, SERVING PLATTERS, DISHES, CAKE STANDS, AND JUGS; POTTERY, NAMELY, FLOWER POTS, PLANT POTS, KITCHEN POTS; PORCELAIN, NAMELY, PORCELAIN PLATES, BOWLS, TEACUPS, CUPS, MUGS, TRAYS, SERVING PLATTERS, DISHES, CAKE STANDS AND JUGS, PORCELAIN FIGURINES, PORCELAIN EGGS AND EARTHENWARE, NAMELY, EARTHENWARE PLATES, BOWLS, TEACUPS, CUPS, MUGS, TRAYS, SERVING PLATTERS, DISHES, CAKE STANDS, VASES AND JUGS; GLASSWARE, NAMELY, BEVERAGE GLASSWARE AND GLASS PLATES, BOWLS, TEACUPS, CUPS, MUGS, TRAYS, SERVING PLATTERS, DISHES, CAKE STANDS AND JUGS; BRUSH-MAKING MATERIALS; ARTICLES FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, NAMELY, CLEANING PADS, RAGS, SPONGES; GLASSWARE, PORCELAIN, AND EARTHENWARE PLATES, BOWLS, TEACUPS, CUPS, MUGS, TRAYS, SERVING PLATTERS, DISHES, CAKE STANDS, VASES AND JUGS; CERAMIC PLATES, BOWLS, TEACUPS, CUPS, MUGS, TRAYS, SERVING PLATTERS, DISHES, CAKE STANDS, VASES, JUGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | (Based on Intent to Use) TEXTILES, NAMELY, COTTON FABRIC, CURTAIN FABRIC, UPHOLSTERY FABRIC AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, QUILTS OF TEXTILE, TEXTILE NAPKINS; CASHMERE, FLAX, COTTON, WOOL, NYLON, SILK, POLYESTER, BAMBOO, AND VISCOSE FABRICS; CASHMERE, FLAX, COTTON, WOOL, NYLON, SILK, BAMBOO, VISCOSE AND POLYESTER FABRIC FOR TEXTILE USE; LINEN, HOUSEHOLD TEXTILE ARTICLES, NAMELY, TEXTILE PLACE MATS, NAPKINS, DRAPERY; CURTAIN AND UPHOLSTERY FABRICS AND FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CUSHIONS AND FURNISHINGS; BEDDING, NAMELY, BED LINEN; FABRIC BED COVERS OF CASHMERE, FLAX, COTTON, WOOL, NYLON, SILK, AND POLYESTER AND TABLE COVERS, NAMELY, FABRIC TABLE TOPPERS OF CASHMERE, FLAX, COTTON, WOOL, NYLON, SILK, AND POLYESTER; TABLECLOTHS OF CASHMERE, FLAX, COTTON, WOOL, NYLON, SILK, AND POLYESTER; TEXTILE TABLE RUNNERS; TEXTILE SERVIETTES; TEXTILE TABLE MATS; TEXTILE COASTERS OF CASHMERE, FLAX, COTTON, WOOL, NYLON, SILK, POLYESTER, BAMBOO FIBRES, YARNS AND VISCOSE; TOWELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use)(Based on 44(e)) RETAIL STORE, WHOLESALE STORE, MAIL ORDER, HOME SHOPPING BY MEANS OF TELEVISION, HOME SHOPPING BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL STORE AND RETAIL FACTORY SHOP SERVICES, ALL FEATURING A VARIETY OF CERAMIC CROCKERY, DOMESTIC UTENSILS AND CONTAINERS, TABLEWARE, OVENWARE, ORNAMENTAL ARTICLES, MODELS, FIGURINES, PLANT CONTAINERS,VASES, CHINAWARE, POTTERY, GLASSWARE, GIFTWARE, PORCELAIN, AND EARTHENWARE, TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |