USPTO serial 77237341
GREEN INDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN INDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
8200 Schaffhausen, CH
8200 Schaffhausen, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martha Gayle Barber
MARTHA GAYLE BARBER ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON ST STE 4000BANK OF AMERICA PLAZACHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Umbrellas; wallets; duffel bags; backpacks; daypacks; waist packs; briefcases; luggage; cosmetic cases sold empty; handbags; textile shopping bags; coin purses; messenger bags; tote bags; and gym bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, coveralls, jackets, pants, shirts, t-shirts, socks, hats and sweatshirts, and headgear, namely, hats, caps, visors, headbands, toques, and bandanas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Timberland Switzerland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Timberland Switzerland GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GREEN INDEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |