USPTO serial 77237695
VIRTUAL SAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL SAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald S. Kadden
RONALD S. KADDEN VON MALTITZ, DERENBERG, KUNIN, JANSSEN &60 EAST 42ND STREETROOM 4410NEW YORK, NY 10165-0102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing comprehensive online courses and online non-downloadable instructional and teaching materials for secondary, post-secondary and college levels; online and on-campus training courses for faculty in the field of online teaching skills; educational services, namely, assisting educational institutions in developing online course materials and curriculums, and educational manuals, all for secondary, post-secondary, vocational, college and graduate and professional school levels | ABANDONED | Aug 29, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |