Drawing for WEB 'N' WALK EXPRESS CARD

USPTO serial 77237840

WEB 'N' WALK EXPRESS CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEB 'N' WALK EXPRESS CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan L. Long

JOAN L. LONG MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication and information technology services, namely, electric, digital, cellular and wireless transmission of voice, data, information, images, signals and messages and transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video and information via telephone, television and global communication networks; providing telecommunications connections over a global communications network, electronic store-and-forward messaging; rental of telecommunications equipment, namely, equipment for electronic access to global telecommunications network, equipment for transmitting, receiving, recording and monitoring voice, data, information, images, signals, messages comprised of data and word processors, and telecommunications hardware components and peripherals thereof for use in the telecommunications industry, and rental of telecommunications equipment for transmitting, receiving, recording and monitoring computer programs for use in operating and accessing telecommunications systems; audio and video broadcasting; providing multiple-user dial-up and dedicated access to the internet; personal communications services; pager services; transmission and broadcast of audio and video programming; leasing of telecommunications equipment, components and systems; providing information via the telephone and the global communication networks in the field of telecommunications; consulting in the field of telecommunicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 26, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 25, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance