Drawing for PERFOROMIST

USPTO serial 77238027

PERFOROMIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFOROMIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

WILLIAM C. WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES, LLP60 E 42ND ST RM 820NEW YORK, NY 10165-0808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely preparations and formulations for the treatment of respiratory disorders, asthma, allergies and allergic emergenciesACTIVE—
010Medical instruments and apparatus for the treatment of respiratory disorders, asthma, allergies and allergic emergenciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 23, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 23, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 1, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 1, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 1, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance