Drawing for THE HELPING HAND FOUNDATION CHOOSE ADOPTION ABORTION

USPTO serial 77238948

THE HELPING HAND FOUNDATION CHOOSE ADOPTION ABORTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HELPING HAND FOUNDATION CHOOSE ADOPTION ABORTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Farley I. Weiss and Mark H. Weiss

Farley I. Weiss and Mark H. Weiss Weiss & Moy, P.C.4204 North Brown AvenueScottsdale, AZ 85251UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public awareness of the need for adoptionACTIVE—
036Charitable fundraising servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance