Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77239020?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77239020. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SLIM JIM SNAP STICKS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77239020, the listed owner(s) include: ConAgra Foods RDM, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 77239020?

Serial number 77239020 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SLIM JIM SNAP STICKS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of SLIM JIM SNAP STICKS?

SLIM JIM SNAP STICKS (77239020) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover SLIM JIM SNAP STICKS?

The public record lists International Classes: 029. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77239020

SLIM JIM SNAP STICKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jul 26, 2007
Status date: Nov 28, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLIM JIM SNAP STICKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

ConAgra Foods RDM, Inc.
Omaha, NE
Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Foods RDM, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Bikus

Christopher M. Bikus Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP1601 Dodge StreetSuite 2100Omaha, NE 68102

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	potato-based snack food, namely, flavored chips	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 8, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 28, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 28, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Nov 27, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 9, 2008	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Sep 9, 2008	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Sep 9, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Aug 20, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 20, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 20, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Aug 15, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Aug 15, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Aug 15, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Aug 15, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Aug 14, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
May 14, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
May 14, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 15, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 15, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2007	GPRN	NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 15, 2007	GPRA	PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 15, 2007	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 12, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 30, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—