USPTO serial 77239390
VITA BURST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITA BURST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. O'Rourke
THOMAS A. O'ROURKE BODNER & O'ROURKE425 BROADHOLLOW RD STE 108MELVILLE, NY 11747-4701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages, namely, mineral water, aerated waters, non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated beverages, fruit drinks, fruit juices and fruit juice beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |