USPTO serial 77239589
MASTERCARD INTEGRATED PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3920042Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MASTERCARD INTEGRATED PROCESSING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colm J. Dobbyn
COLM J. DOBBYN MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED2000 PURCHASE STREETLAW DEPARTMENTPURCHASE, NY 10577-2509Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, debit card services, pre-paid card services offered through cards with stored value, electronic debit transactions, cash disbursement in the nature of automated teller machines services, deposit access and automated teller machine services, electronic processing of electronic payments; electronic funds transfer; currency exchange services; dissemination of financial information via a global computer network, financial information rendered by computer by means of a secure information computer network and advisory services regarding all of the foregoing services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MASTERCARD INTEGRATED PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |