CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CHILLI PEPPER

USPTO serial 77239774

CHILLI PEPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILLI PEPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

JEFFREY H. GREGER LOWE HAUPTMAN BERNER1700 DIAGONAL RD STE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2866UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SunglassesACTIVE—
018Articles made of leather or imitation leather, namely, bags, handbags, rucksacks, shoulder bags, beach bags, athletic bags, tote bags, carry-on luggage, clutch bags, traveling bags, wallets, purses, leather check book covers, brief cases, hip pouches, luggage, parasols, umbrellas, jewelry boxes, vanity cases sold empy, toiletry kits sold emptyACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, pants, shorts, sweat pants, jeans, overalls, shirts, t-shirts, sweat shirts, knit tops and skirts, blouses, skirts, dresses, jackets, vests, coats, rainwear, shoes, lingerie, sleepwear, loungewear, swimwear, gloves, socks, hosiery, belts, scarves, hats, ties, slippers, sweaters, footwear and headwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance