Drawing for HOLISTIS

USPTO serial 77239792

HOLISTIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HOLISTIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirk A. Damman

KIRK A. DAMMAN LEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, L.C.BOX IP DEPARTMENT500 NORTH BROADWAY, SUITE 2000ST. LOUIS, MO 63102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for content management, content deployment, content provision, data mining, content delivery, optimizing and personalizing content delivery for websites, automation and assistance in website development and internet advertisingACTIVE—
035business consultancy services; computer services, namely managing website content for others; marketing services, namely, collecting marketing information, compiling customer specific databases for marketing purposes and consulting; business information services, namely, marketing trend information; website optimization and personalization services; internet advertising services; providing commercial information and advice for consumers related to internet advertising; information and data compiling and analysis related to marketing activities of others; management and compilation of computer databases; internet advertising on a computer network; compilation of statistics; market research; modelling for advertising and sales promotion; opinion polling; promotional services, namely, promoting goods and services of others; advertising services, namely, preparing advertisement for others, advertising the wares and services of others on communication media; sales promotion for third parties; database management; internet advertisingACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, computer software design, computer software development, computer software maintenance, information and content management, website design, website optimization and personalizationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance