USPTO serial 77239852
C.R.I.S.I.S. - CONTINGENCY READINESS & INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY INFORMATION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3791814Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with C.R.I.S.I.S. - CONTINGENCY READINESS & INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY INFORMATION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
Kevin Oliveira ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400Reston, VA 20190-5159UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research in the field of intelligence and security; computer consultation in the filed of computer security; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer consulting services in the field of planning, designing, and analyzing business information processes and reengineering software and hardware systems for others; computer information systems analysis and design of computer systems and software for others; design for others of web sites and software applications therefor on local and internal computer networks and the internet; providing design, development and hosting services for others' internet web sites on a global computer network; maintenance of software, software systems and internet web sites for third parties; information technology consultation services; computer consultation on the computer-related aspects of information technology security; computer consultation in the field of computer security; providing information over local and internal computer networks and the internet on the subjects of computer systems analysis, computer systems design services, and software and software development; and providing information via the internet on the subjects of software design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 27, 2006 |
| 045 | consulting services in the field of national security | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 27, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named C.R.I.S.I.S. - CONTINGENCY READINESS & INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY INFORMATION SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |