CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ALPHABITZ

USPTO serial 77240022

ALPHABITZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPHABITZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

David W. Grace Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica BoulevardSuite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Three dimensional models for educational purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 19, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 21, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
May 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance