USPTO serial 77240264
VH2O VITAMINSPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VH2O VITAMINSPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pickering, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie A. Greenberg
JULIE A. GREENBERG GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.PO BOX 7021TROY, MI 48007-7021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Beverages, namely vitamin enhanced water; beverages, namely vitamin enhanced water in bottles, carboys and packages for individual servings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |