USPTO serial 77240297
TOSEI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOSEI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toyama-shi, Toyama, JP
Toyama-shi, Toyama, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Galbreath
JOHN A. GALBREATH GALBREATH LAW OFFICES, P.C.2516 CHESTNUT WOODS CTREISTERSTOWN, MD 21136-5523UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mining machines and apparatus, namely, mine borers, coal cutting machines, cutting machines, cutting machine parts, namely, cutting bars, ore treating machines, extractors for mines; mineworking machines, namely, excavators, conveyors, graders, classifiers, collectors, screeners, tumblers, mills, and washers; construction machines and apparatus, namely, bulldozers, concrete construction machines, drilling bits that are parts of machines, earth moving machines, excavators, mud catchers and collectors, rams, road making machines, shredders for industrial use, road sweeping machines, electric hand drills; loading-unloading machines and apparatus, namely, roller bridges, cranes, conveyors, escalators, hoists, hoppers for unloading, loading apparatus, namely, hydraulic lift tables, loading rams, winches; chemical processing machines and apparatus, namely, presses for chemical processing, agitators for chemical processing, drying machines for chemical processing, mixing machines for chemical processing, sintering machines for chemical processing, calcining machines for chemical processing, sorting machines for chemical processing, granulating machines for chemical processing, extracting machines for chemical processing, emulsifying machines for chemical processing, kneading machines for chemical processing, disintegrators for chemical processing, separating machines for chemical processing, grinding machines for chemical processing, filtering machines for chemical processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vessels and their parts and fittings, namely, sailing vessels, screw-propellers, steering gears and rudders for vessels, oars, oarlocks, canoe paddles, fenders for ships, structural parts for boats, namely, boat hooks, davits for boats, portholes; air craft and their parts and fittings, namely, air craft, fuselages, landing gears, landing gear wheels, inner tubes for air craft wheel tires, airplanes; railway rolling stock and their parts and fittings, namely, railway rolling stock, railway rolling stock wheels; automobiles and their parts and fitting, namely, automobiles, air bags safety devices for automobiles, windscreens, air pumps, automobile chains, rearview mirrors, structural parts for automobiles; two-wheeled motor vehicles and their parts and fittings and bicycles and their parts and fittings, namely, two-wheeled motor vehicles, bicycles, mudguards, tires of two-wheeled motor vehicles and bicycles, frames for bicycles and motorcycles, gears for bicycles and motorcycles, grip tape for bicycles and motorcycles, kickstands for bicycles and motorcycles, chains for bicycles and motorcycles, bicycle brakes, handle bars for bicycles and motorcycles, bells of two-wheeled motor vehicles and bicycles, saddles for bicycles and motorcycles, rims for wheel of bicycles and motorcycles; baby carriages; wheelchairs; rickshaws; sleighs; wheelbarrows; carts; horse drawn carriages; bicycle trailers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |