Drawing for C. CHASE

USPTO serial 77240454

C. CHASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C. CHASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Pruess

Stuart Rogers1400 K Street NW, Suite 501Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, magazines, books, journals, digests, directories, information kits, magazine supplements to newspapers, trade and professional books, all in the field of news, current events, human interest stories, lifestyle and general interest subjects, stickers, calendars, photo albums, posters, removable tattoosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 10, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 10, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance