Drawing for YEMINN

USPTO serial 77240456

YEMINN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YEMINN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria A. Savio

MARIA A. SAVIO GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for allowing secure website registration without requiring email, telephone number, fax number or postal address information for purposes of registration; software for secure website access which allows for direct site administrator and registrant interaction; software to enable searching of data; software for monitoring or controlling access to multiple internet sites or combination thereof and for allowing secure access to such sites through one registration processACTIVE—
035Rental of advertising space; dissemination of advertising matter; database management; preparing compilation of advertisements for others for use as web pages on the Internet; targeted advertising services; provision of advertisement and publicity services in relation to the Internet; compilation and provision of business and commercial information in relation to the InternetACTIVE—
039Electronic storage and retrieval of business and commercial information in relation to the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance