USPTO serial 77240797
PROPPER DEFENDER ECHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3703971Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 3, 2009
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROPPER DEFENDER ECHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Propper International Sales, Inc.
Saint Charles, MO
Propper International Sales, Inc.
St. Charles, MO
Propper International Sales, Inc.
St. Charles, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Courtney Jackson
Courtney Jackson Armstrong Teasdale LLP7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1800Saint Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, hats, gloves, pants, shirts, shorts, vests, coats, underwear, sweaters, and footwear for public safety personnel | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Propper International Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Propper International Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Propper International Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PROPPER DEFENDER ECHO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2015 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2014 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |